Saturday, March 8, 2014

Forced to flee false perceptions, ICC, and Kenyan press

Forced to flee false perceptions, ICC, and Kenyan press

Omwa Ombara left Kenya for the United States. (CPJ)
Omwa Ombara left Kenya for the United States. (CPJ)
EDITOR'S NOTE: February 15, 2014 marked one year since Omwa Ombara arrived in the U.S. to seek political asylum after attempts on her life in Kenya between May and December 2012. She fled her native land after being contacted by International Criminal Court (ICC) investigators probing the violence that followed the Kenyan elections in 2007-2008, in which more than 1,000 people were killed, according to news reports. Ombara was never a witness, nor did she ever meet any ICC investigators, but the mere suspicion that she was participating in the ICC process prompted a spate of threats. She describes her own ordeal and the culture of silence that has settled over most of the Kenyan media. CPJ's Journalist Assistance program supported Ombara throughout her ordeal.
As the world watches the efforts of the ICC to prosecute Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta, his deputy William Ruto, and journalist Joshua Sang for post-election violence in Kenya, few realize the repercussions for those of us perceived to have been witnesses. Nowadays in Kenya, even the word "witness" has been tagged with such a hostile connotation that one had rather not use it.
Anyone who attempts to say anything they know about the infamous post-election violence in Kenya in 2007-2008 risks being branded an "unpatriotic traitor," whistleblowers who want to reveal Kenyan society's "dirty secrets"--they can lose their lives at any time.
Many Kenyans do not want to believe that among prosecutor Fatou Bensouda's list of Kenyan witnesses, some could be real and deserve a chance to be heard. It is as if a political spell has been cast on the Kenyan people. Some Kenyan journalists too have caught the conspiracy bug, while some have been bewitched into emotional propaganda reporting, or dazed into silence.  Most have lost their tongues and pens.
Indeed post-election violence did take place and those of us who were reporters in the field covered both the election campaign and the violence. The lack of balanced reporting is a big failure in the journalism fraternity. Political wolves hound those who will testify as well as those they think might enter the witness box, ready to dismiss any account that could put the politicians they support on the spot. And while this happens, the Kenyan media continue to run with the crowd. There is hardly any analytical reporting on The Hague trials, merely a regurgitation of a dangerous public chorus. Instead, the Kenyan media focus on the apparent failures of witnesses and the prosecution.
I arrived in the U.S. a year ago to seek political asylum after attempts on my life in Kenya between May and December 2012.
A mere phone call in May 2012 from an investigator from the International Criminal Court (ICC) changed my life and put me in danger. I was never a witness nor did I ever meet any Hague investigators but some people somewhere in government perceived that I was one and from there the intimidation started. People I believe to be state agents not only followed my every move, but also tried to abduct me twice--in the capital, Nairobi, and the western city of Kisumu. Some men in plainclothes went to homes of my relatives demanding to know my whereabouts. They hacked my e-mails and blocked my phones. I immediately went into witness protection and contacted the Committee to Protect Journalists.
The Hague investigator wanted to discuss an interview I had done in 2008 with an investigative journalist regarding corruption by both media and politicians. The story was later published in a local magazine called Expression Today under the title "Dirty Hands" by Otsieno Namwaya. They were interested in candid comments I made about corruption in the media while I was the Standard's bureau chief in the coastal city of Mombasa. Corruption in the media involved incidences where individual reporters and editors accepted bribes either in kind, cash, or gifts from certain politicians to have their stories captured favorably. This practice is common among journalists and politicians in East Africa. This interview was about some media coverage in 2007, prior to the Kenya's chaotic elections, and touched on some politicians who the ICC later had an interest in prosecuting.
Being perceived to be a witness put my life in danger. In an effort to escape from my pursuers I fled from one part of the country to another. I tried to hide. Walking in the streets, in dark shadows waiting for a shot in my back any moment was one of the scariest experiences I have ever had.
With the help of the Committee to Protect Journalists' Nairobi and New York offices, and witness protection agencies, I escaped by the skin of my teeth. A driver in an unmarked car not only tried to knock me down as I waited for a taxi in Kisumu, but just moments after I had served dinner and sat to eat in Nairobi, a white unmarked car with four men tried to abduct me from my house. I jumped out of my back window and fled. Being under protection meant a humble monthly allowance of 20,000 Kenyan shillings (US$231) a month, far below my monthly income of 120, 000 to 150,000 shillings (US$1,300-$1,700) that I made while working.
But today is an exciting day for me. As I sit in my room, awaiting my asylum interview, I toast to my freedom. I live in the inner city. I have moved from a shelter where I lived for the past six months. The winter chill is biting and everyone is in a hoodie. I watch the fierce winter snowstorm through my window. But I am not afraid of it. I do not even feel the cold weather everyone is complaining about. The warmth of safety emanating from my heart keeps me warm and safe and that is all I feel now. Living in a small neighborhood in the city is a unique experience, something akin to living in the rural villages of Kenya, where everyone knows everyone's business and is always friendly and ready to assist.
I miss home--no Kenyan should feel more entitled to citizenship than another. Those who cast the stones at real and perceived witnesses have never had a phone call from The Hague asking them to be a witness. They have never worn the shoes of being in the middle of a bloodthirsty emotive crowd and Hague investigators. Like mourners at a funeral who cry louder than the bereaved and eat the chunkiest meat, they are nothing but actors who feel nothing for the dead or the bereaved. If they truly loved Kenya they would have come up with the truth by now.
I am a product, or should that be a casualty, of investigative journalism; that secretive world of bringing things that happen in darkness to light. A world that is often wrought with danger, something akin to being on the war front, and few journalists opt for this dangerous and narrow road. Some are shot dead after exposing crime, corruption, and other evils in society. Some are declared enemies of the state, while some become enemies of the very society they are trying to protect. It is a risky job and definitely not for the fainthearted.
Freedom of expression still remains elusive in Kenya as real witnesses are denied a chance to give evidence in court through threats and intimidation. Kenyan media need to support the work of investigative journalists--to nurture society's watchdog and restore its image as the Fourth Estate. With investigative journalists who do not fear exposing the truth, the circus going on at The Hague now would long have been put to rest.

Crimean authorities take two more broadcasters off air

Crimean authorities take two more broadcasters off air

Cossacks stand guard near the Crimean parliament building in Simferopol, March 6. (Reuters/David Mdzinarishvili)
Cossacks stand guard near the Crimean parliament building in Simferopol, March 6. (Reuters/David Mdzinarishvili)
New York, March 6, 2014--Crimean authorities should immediately restore broadcasting in the region by the independent Ukraine television stations Channel 5 and Channel 1+1, the Committee to Protect Journalists said today.
According to local journalists in Crimea and news reports, regional authorities in the administrative center Simferopol stopped transmitting the two privately owned broadcasters' analogue signals to the peninsula today on the order of Sergei Aksenov, the recently appointed pro-Russian prime minister of the region. Earlier this week his government threatened in a statement to "shut off the flow of deceitful and biased information in order to save the public from negative impact," the independent news website Lenta reported.
A spokeswoman for Channel 5 told CPJ by phone that the station's programming is currently unavailable in Crimea and that regional authorities have not responded to Channel 5's requests for explanation. Evgeniy Garkusha of the Simferopol-based Center for Investigative Journalism told CPJ that some regional cable networks also stopped carrying programming of the two channels. Garkusha said Russian state-owned broadcasters Rossiya and Rossiya-24 are being transmitted on the airwaves of Channel 5 and Channel 1+1.
CPJ's calls to Crimea's State Television and Radio Transmitting Center for comment went unanswered.
This is the second time this week that regional authorities have moved to censor independent broadcasters in Crimea. On Monday, popular independent broadcaster Chernomorskaya Teleradiokompaniya (Black Sea TV) had its signal removed from the air without explanation.
"We condemn this blatant censorship of Ukrainian television stations which is part of a growing pattern by Crimean authorities of restricting the flow of independent news and opinion," CPJ Europe and Central Asia Program Coordinator Nina Ognianova said. "All inhabitants of the peninsula have a right to unfettered access to news. The authorities must restore transmission of Channel 5, Channel 1+1, and Chernomorskaya Teleradiokompaniya immediately."  
Chernomorskaya Teleradiokompaniya and Channel 1+1 have also experienced debilitating denial-of service (DOS) attacks on their websites. According to the BBC, hacking and DOS attacks between Ukrainian and Russian websites and telecommunications networks have intensified in recent weeks.
Separately today, pro-Russian protesters attacked a Channel 5 crew when the journalists approached the Ukrainian navy headquarters in the city of Sevastopol, news reports said.
According to Institute of Mass Information (IMI), a Kiev-based press freedom group, journalists reporting on the stand-off between Russia and the interim Ukrainian government over the future of Crimea have faced official obstruction, intimidation, and physical attacks from pro-Russian protesters. The IMI documented 24 such incidents since mid-February.
Tension in the predominantly Russian-speaking southern and eastern Ukraine hasincreased since Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych fled the country and was oustedby Parliament late last month. Over the weekend, the Russian military occupied parts of the Crimean peninsula. Today, the Crimean Parliament voted to become part of Russia, and scheduled a referendum on the issue for March 16, news reports said.  

Wednesday, March 5, 2014

Six men convicted of murdering TV journalist in Pakistan

Six men convicted of murdering TV journalist in Pakistan

A Pakistani court has convicted six people for their roles in the murder of Wali Khan Babar, a Geo TV journalist who was shot dead in Karachi in January 2011.
The convictions are significant because they are the first in a decade to follow the murder of any journalist in Pakistan, where impunity has reigned.
Babar, who had been threatened because of his coverage of political corruption, extortion and land-grabbing, was shot to death while driving home from work.
After his murder, several people connected to the investigation, including a police informant, two police officers and the brother of an investigating officer, were also killed.
In 2012, the one remaining witness to the case who had agreed to testify in court, was murdered. And the two original prosecutors in the case were threatened and fled into exile.
Police said the murders were organised by the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM), Pakistan's third-largest political party, which has repeatedly denied any involvement.
A special anti-terrorism court sentenced Naveed Polka, Muhammad Ali Rizvi, Faisal Mahmood and Mohammad Shahrukh Khan to life in prison for the murder of Babar. Two others, Kamran (alias "Zeeshan") and Faisal Mota, who have not yet been arrested, were sentenced to death in absentia.
Bob Dietz, the Asia programme coordinator for the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), said: "These convictions mark a significant step in addressing the deep-rooted culture of impunity surrounding the murders of journalists in Pakistan.
"They indicate what can be achieved when the country's legal system commits itself to pursuing justice."
The CPJ published a special report in May 2013, Roots of impunity,which documented the lead-up to Babar's murder and its aftermath.
Prior to these convictions, the high-profile killing of US reporter Daniel Pearl in Pakistan was the only known journalist murder case in the country in which partial justice was carried out.
At least 46 journalists have been killed in Pakistan over the course of the last decade, according to CPJ research.
Source: CPJ

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Security agents still hound journalist after detaining, torturing him

Security agents still hound journalist after detaining, torturing him

SECURITY AGENTS STILL HOUND JOURNALIST AFTER DETAINING, TORTURING HIM

PUBLISHED ON TUESDAY 25 FEBRUARY 2014.
Reporters Without Borders is appalled by the way the National Intelligence and Security Agency (NISA) is persecuting Mohamed Bare, the director of Mogadishu-based Radio Danan.
Released on 13 February after being held arbitrarily for three days and tortured, Bare received a summons yesterday for interrogation at NISA headquarters.
“Repeated arrests and interrogations are being used to hound the media and, in this case, Radio Danan in particular,” said Cléa Kahn-Sriber, the head of the Reporters Without Borders Africa Desk.
“The intelligence agencies seem to have embarked on a witch-hunt against the media although there are clearly other security priorities in Somalia to which they should be devoting their energies. ”
“Arresting journalists arbitrarily, holding them without charge and mistreating them in detention will just tarnish the image of a government that is trying to establish itself. The new communication minister should use his appointment to defuse tension with the media. We urge the authorities to end the previous government’s policy of hounding and persecuting media personnel and instead to guarantee journalists’ safety.”
In response to yesterday’s summons, Bare went to NISA headquarters today accompanied by Ismail Yussuf, the president of the Somali Independent Media House Association (SIMHA), and other SIMHA representatives. However, instead of being received, he was told to return tomorrow for interrogation.
The summons is linked to the interview he gave to local media after his release in which he named certain NISA officers as the persons who should be held responsible if he was murdered.
NISA officers arrested Bare on 11 February for posting photos on the Radio Danan website showing the Lower Shabelle region’s vice-president after he was injured by a bomb. Bare was arrested on the Sayidka road on the outskirts of Mogadishu along with Radio Haatuf directorIbrahim Mohamed Ali and Radio Antenna technician Abdikarim Fiidow.
The three media workers were taken to NISA headquarters for interrogation and were then held for three days in the NISA’s notorious Mogadishu detention centre, where NISA officers tortured the two radio directors and threatened to kill them if they continued their critical coverage of the government.
NISA officers also raided Radio Danan and threatened its employees for reporting Bare’s arrest. Bare continued to receive threatening phone calls after he and the other two media workers were released on 13 February.
Somalia is ranked 176th out of 180 countries in the 2014 Reporters Without Borders press freedom index.
Photo : Mohamed Bare

Pakistan most dangerous place for journalists: PFUJ

Pakistan most dangerous place for journalists: PFUJ


 
QUETTA: The president of PFUJ (Pakistan federal Union of Journalists), Hafiz Afzal has declared Pakistan as the most dangerous place for journalists, with 103 of them being the victims.

Addressing the 2nd 3-day meeting of central executive committee (CEC) of PFUJ here in Balochistan’s Provincial capital, he expressed his strong concerns that unfortunately none of the killers of the journalists, facing multi- faceted wraths of terrorism, official censure and high discriminations of media bosses , had been brought to justice.
Speaking on the occasion, President Afzal Butt cited 35 journalistic killings in Balochistan, and while paying rich tributes to the resolving that nothing would deter the journalists from conveying truth to masses.
Terming the year 2014 as worst for journalists, he also lambasted callous and indifferent rulers for being totally indifferent to problems faced by journalists. “When in opposition everybody terms journalists as Apple of their eyes, while once in power, these very journalists rather become a sore thorn in eyes” he scoffed, resolving that “we would have to fight our Jihad against such discrimination and suppression of truth”.
Joint declarations for immediate resolve of 7th wage board award, compensation fund for kin of slain journalists, arrest of murderers of journalists, and unwonted downsizings and replacements in media houses were also approved, and publicly announced.
A regular movement from PFUJ platform, for creating awareness among journalist fraternity about their rights was also agreed upon, and 20th March was selected for being celebrated as “day of demand(ing rights)”, during which thousands of journalists from across Pakistan would stage a sit-in outside Punjab Assembly.
The presidents and secretaries of all respective journalistic unions also presented their performance reports, while also deliberating over administrative issues. The CEC also asked all union journalists to open their memberships, and complete the scrutiny process for expediting elections.
The event was participated by PFUJ presidents, secretaries of Rawalpindi-Islamabad, Peshawar, Quetta, Lahore, Faisalabad, Gujranwala, Abbottabad, Multan, Rahimyar Khan, Sukkur, Hyderabad and Karachi.

Irish journalist faces 50 sex charges

Irish journalist faces 50 sex charges

GardaThe accused must sign on three times a week at Ballymun Garda Station in Dublin
A 50-year-old journalist has appeared in court in the Republic of Ireland charged with 50 sex offences involving teenage girls.
The man, who cannot be identified at this stage of the proceedings, was arrested just after 09:00 GMT and taken to Ballymun Garda Station in Dublin.
After caution, he made no reply to the charges.
He faces seven charges of engaging in a sexual act with an underage child on dates in 2011.
The man also faces three charges of sexual assault against the same person on dates in 2007 at a number of locations, including a hotel car park in Dublin, and in Donegal.
He faces 40 charges relating to child exploitation, including inducing or coercing a child to engage in the production of child pornography and inducing or coercing her to engage in a sexual, indecent or obscene act.
These offences are alleged to have occurred between 2008 and 2011.
The man was remanded on bail on his own bond of 500 euros (£412) and an independent surety of 2,000 euros (£1,648).
As part of his bail conditions, he must sign on three times a week at Ballymun Garda Station. He has also surrendered his passport.
He is due in court again on 29 April.
The court heard the Director of Public Prosecutions had directed he be tried on indictment, which means he will be sent forward to a higher court for trial.
He has not yet indicated how he will plead to the charges.
A defence solicitor told the judge that the DPP agreed the case should have reporting restrictions because of the nature of the charges.
This means the man cannot be identified at this stage.
Mr Hennessy told the judge the man would be applying for legal aid at the next court sitting.

Tuesday, February 25, 2014

PH top 3 in media killings

PH top 3 in media killings

By Ronald Reyes 
ANOTHER media watchdog echoed the finding of other global press groups and said the Philippines ranked third among the most dangerous places for journalists, next only to Syria and Iraq.
In its annual report “Killing The Messenger,” the International News Safety Institute said 14 journalists were killed in the Philippines, next to Syria with 20 journalists killed and Iraq with 16.
Of the 14 journalists who were killed in the Philippines, four were officially listed as having died while they were working at a radio station in Tacloban City when super typhoon “Yolanda” hit the area on November 8.
The journalists killed by Yolanda were Ronald Vi?as and and Allan Medino of radio station dyVL and Archi Globio and Malou Realino of radio station dyBR. The four were killed while they were working as Yolanda hit the country.
But according to the Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility, 10 other media workers, who were on duty when the typhoon struck remained missing as of Wednesday but no death certificates have been issued for them.
The 10 are Violy Custodio, Boy Mendigo, Jenevive Catubao, Joyce Catubao of dyVL; Baby Jaca, June Estoya, Lulu Palencia of dyBR, Gerry Lumantas of dyXY, Christina Gabrillo of dyAC and Ariel Aguillon of Bombo Radyo.
The CMFR also reported 44 other media workers who were injured during typhoon or whose homes were destroyed.
In the INSI’s “Killing The Messenger” report, the group noted that 69 of the 134 deaths of journalists and media staff occurred in peace time while the rest occurred during armed conflicts in different parts of the world.
The INSI said their report, carried out by the Cardiff School for Journalism in the United Kingdom, was an analysis of the situations of the 134 deceased journalists and staff in 29 countries.
Aside from the finding that more journalists were killed in peacetime than during armed conflict, the study also showed that 92 percent of those killed were local journalists and more print journalists were slain than any other medium.
The toll is down by almost 12 per cent compared to the 152 who died in 2012, although INSI is worried by what appears to be a rise in the numbers of assaults, threats and kidnappings of journalists - which go unreported for the most part.
Last week, the international media group Reporters Sans Frontieres (Reporters Without Borders) said the Philippine media remain in a “difficult situation” and the environment of freedom has even worsened.
According to the RSF’s “2014 World Press Freedom Index,” the Philippines went down two notches to the 149th spot among the 180 countries included in the index, even worse than newcomer Belize which was on 29th spot.
In 2010, the year following the Maguindanao massacre that left 58 people dead, including 32 journalists, the country was at the 156th place.
When President Benigno Aquino III took office, the country managed only to climb to 140th spot in 2011 before sliding down again to the 147th place last year.
Even the troubled countries of Mali (now ranked 122nd) and the Central African Republic (now 109th) , which dropped more than 120 spots, were better off than the Philippines, the index showed.
Throughout 2013, RSF had repeatedly raised concerns about the killings and attempted killings of journalists and objected to the Aquino administration’s anti-cybercrime law because its online defamation provision “poses too much of a threat to freedom of information.”
A study conducted by the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism showed that 23 journalists have been killed during the first 40 months of Aquino’s term.
If the Ampatuan 32 were to be excluded in the equation, the PCIJ said Aquino has the worst case load of media killings since 1986.
Based on the impunity index rating of the Committee to Protect Journalists, the Philippines is the third most dangerous place for journalists, next to Iraq and Somalia.